The president recently signed a bill to allow funding for stem cell research. The bill opened the door for scientists to use the hundreds of embryos destined for dumpsters behind clinics for studying. I am confused by the vehement opposition to this type of research. Isn’t the potential development of a cure for cancer or blindness a more virtuous purpose for those cells headed to the trash?

We might be a long way from the paralyzed taking their first steps, but then again, we might not. Nothing proves more promising to reaching these goals than stem cell research, including the embryionic type.

You know, the same people that oppose stem cell research for moral or religious beliefs, see no problem with the reason this surplus of embryos exists; Doctors “making” babies. If the belief is that life and death are truely the will of God (any God you choose), then pregnancy should not result from scientific interference including invetro and fertility drugs.

But, this double-standard is pervasive in the issue of life. If life and death are truely God’s will (or a natural process), then Terry Schiavo should have died 15 years before she actually did. However, lifers were out in full force fighting for her scientifically-controlled existence.

The bottom line is that there is a lot of gray area in this issue. As uncomfortable as some scientific research might make some, it may improve the lives of many who are suffering. In fact, as scientific discoveries continue proving to us every day, it does and will continue to improve the lives of the living.

Every one is entitled to their own moral judgement and religious (or non-religious) beliefs. You and your loved ones (or any other person) are not being hurt by this research. In fact, it is likely that someone you love will benefit from the findings someday.